首页> 外文OA文献 >Perspectives of family members participating in cultural assessment of psychiatric disorders : findings from the DSM-5 international field trial
【2h】

Perspectives of family members participating in cultural assessment of psychiatric disorders : findings from the DSM-5 international field trial

机译:参与精神疾病文化评估的家庭成员的观点:Dsm-5国际田间试验的结果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Abstract Despite the important roles families play in the lives of many individuals with mental illness across cultures, there is a dearth of data worldwide on how family members perceive the process of cultural assessment as well as to how to best include them. This study addresses this gap in our knowledge through analysis of data collected across six countries as part of a DSM-5 Field Trial of the Cultural Formulation Interview (CFI). At clinician discretion, individuals who accompanied patients to the clinic visit (i.e. patient companions) at the time the CFI was conducted were invited to participate in the cultural assessment and answer questions about their experience. The specific aims of this paper are (1) to describe patterns of participation of patient companions in the CFI across the six countries, and (2) to examine the comparative feasibility, acceptability, and clinical utility of the CFI from companion perspectives through analysis of both quantitative and qualitative data. Among the 321 patient interviews, only 86 (at four of 12 sites) included companions, all of whom were family members or other relatives. The utility, feasibility and acceptability of the CFI were rated favourably by relatives, supported by qualitative analyses of debriefing interviews. Cross-site differences in frequency of accompaniment merit further study.
机译:摘要尽管家庭在许多跨文化的精神疾病患者的生活中起着重要作用,但全球缺乏有关家庭成员如何看待文化评估过程以及如何最好地将其包括在内的数据。这项研究通过对在六个国家/地区进行的数据收集进行分析来解决我们在知识方面的差距,这是DSM-5文化配方访谈(CFI)田间试验的一部分。根据临床医师的判断,邀请进行CFI时陪同患者进行临床访问的个人(即患者陪同人员)参加文化评估并回答有关其经历的问题。本文的具体目标是(1)描述六个国家/地区的患者同伴参与CFI的方式,以及(2)从同伴的角度通过对CFI的分析来检查CFI的比较可行性,可接受性和临床实用性定量和定性数据。在321名患者访谈中,只有86名(在12个地点中的四个地点)包括同伴,他们都是家庭成员或其他亲戚。对CFI的效用,可行性和可接受性的评价受到亲戚的好评,并辅以对访谈情况的定性分析。跨站点的伴奏频率差异值得进一步研究。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号